19 found
Order:
  1.  34
    The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.James S. Magnuson, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Richard N. Aslin & Delphine Dahan - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (2):202.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  2.  28
    The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition.James S. Magnuson, James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (1):133-156.
    The sounds that make up spoken words are heard in a series and must be mapped rapidly onto words in memory because their elements, unlike those of visual words, cannot simultaneously exist or persist in time. Although theories agree that the dynamics of spoken word recognition are important, they differ in how they treat the nature of the competitor set—precisely which words are activated as an auditory word form unfolds in real time. This study used eye tracking to measure the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  3.  36
    Interaction in Spoken Word Recognition Models: Feedback Helps.James S. Magnuson, Daniel Mirman, Sahil Luthra, Ted Strauss & Harlan D. Harris - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  4.  60
    The time course of anticipatory constraint integration.Anuenue Kukona, Shin-Yi Fang, Karen A. Aicher, Helen Chen & James S. Magnuson - 2011 - Cognition 119 (1):23-42.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  5.  25
    The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition.James S. Magnuson, James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (1):133-156.
    The sounds that make up spoken words are heard in a series and must be mapped rapidly onto words in memory because their elements, unlike those of visual words, cannot simultaneously exist or persist in time. Although theories agree that the dynamics of spoken word recognition are important, they differ in how they treat the nature of the competitor set—precisely which words are activated as an auditory word form unfolds in real time. This study used eye tracking to measure the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  6.  24
    Spoken word recognition without a TRACE.Thomas Hannagan, James S. Magnuson & Jonathan Grainger - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  7.  17
    EARSHOT: A Minimal Neural Network Model of Incremental Human Speech Recognition.James S. Magnuson, Heejo You, Sahil Luthra, Monica Li, Hosung Nam, Monty Escabí, Kevin Brown, Paul D. Allopenna, Rachel M. Theodore, Nicholas Monto & Jay G. Rueckl - 2020 - Cognitive Science 44 (4):e12823.
    Despite the lack of invariance problem (the many‐to‐many mapping between acoustics and percepts), human listeners experience phonetic constancy and typically perceive what a speaker intends. Most models of human speech recognition (HSR) have side‐stepped this problem, working with abstract, idealized inputs and deferring the challenge of working with real speech. In contrast, carefully engineered deep learning networks allow robust, real‐world automatic speech recognition (ASR). However, the complexities of deep learning architectures and training regimens make it difficult to use them to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  22
    The link between statistical segmentation and word learning in adults.Daniel Mirman, James S. Magnuson, Katharine Graf Estes & James A. Dixon - 2008 - Cognition 108 (1):271-280.
  9.  29
    Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past.James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (2):285-298.
    The question of when and how bottom‐up input is integrated with top‐down knowledge has been debated extensively within cognition and perception, and particularly within language processing. A long running debate about the architecture of the spoken‐word recognition system has centered on the locus of lexical effects on phonemic processing: does lexical knowledge influence phoneme perception through feedback, or post‐perceptually in a purely feedforward system? Elman and McClelland (1988) reported that lexically restored ambiguous phonemes influenced the perception of the following phoneme, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  10.  12
    Robust Lexically Mediated Compensation for Coarticulation: Christmash Time Is Here Again.Sahil Luthra, Giovanni Peraza-Santiago, Keia'na Beeson, David Saltzman, Anne Marie Crinnion & James S. Magnuson - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (4):e12962.
    A long-standing question in cognitive science is how high-level knowledge is integrated with sensory input. For example, listeners can leverage lexical knowledge to interpret an ambiguous speech sound, but do such effects reflect direct top-down influences on perception or merely postperceptual biases? A critical test case in the domain of spoken word recognition is lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation (LCfC). Previous LCfC studies have shown that a lexically restored context phoneme (e.g., /s/ in Christma#) can alter the perceived place of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  16
    Investigating the Extent to which Distributional Semantic Models Capture a Broad Range of Semantic Relations.Kevin S. Brown, Eiling Yee, Gitte Joergensen, Melissa Troyer, Elliot Saltzman, Jay Rueckl, James S. Magnuson & Ken McRae - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (5):e13291.
    Distributional semantic models (DSMs) are a primary method for distilling semantic information from corpora. However, a key question remains: What types of semantic relations among words do DSMs detect? Prior work typically has addressed this question using limited human data that are restricted to semantic similarity and/or general semantic relatedness. We tested eight DSMs that are popular in current cognitive and psycholinguistic research (positive pointwise mutual information; global vectors; and three variations each of Skip-gram and continuous bag of words (CBOW) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  24
    Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition.James S. Magnuson, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):866-873.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  13.  24
    Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: a tale of two systems?James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (5):801-805.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  14.  27
    Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.Daniel Mirman, James L. McClelland, Lori L. Holt & James S. Magnuson - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (2):398-417.
    The effects of lexical context on phonological processing are pervasive and there have been indications that such effects may be modulated by attention. However, attentional modulation in speech processing is neither well documented nor well understood. Experiment 1 demonstrated attentional modulation of lexical facilitation of speech sound recognition when task and critical stimuli were identical across attention conditions. We propose modulation of lexical activation as a neurophysiologically plausible computational mechanism that can account for this type of modulation. Contrary to the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15.  8
    Contra assertions, feedback improves word recognition: How feedback and lateral inhibition sharpen signals over noise.James S. Magnuson, Anne Marie Crinnion, Sahil Luthra, Phoebe Gaston & Samantha Grubb - 2024 - Cognition 242 (C):105661.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  18
    Friends in Low‐Entropy Places: Orthographic Neighbor Effects on Visual Word Identification Differ Across Letter Positions.Sahil Luthra, Heejo You, Jay G. Rueckl & James S. Magnuson - 2020 - Cognitive Science 44 (12):e12917.
    Visual word recognition is facilitated by the presence of orthographic neighbors that mismatch the target word by a single letter substitution. However, researchers typically do not consider where neighbors mismatch the target. In light of evidence that some letter positions are more informative than others, we investigate whether the influence of orthographic neighbors differs across letter positions. To do so, we quantify the number of enemies at each letter position (how many neighbors mismatch the target word at that position). Analyses (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  24
    Effect of Representational Distance Between Meanings on Recognition of Ambiguous Spoken Words.Daniel Mirman, Ted J. Strauss, James A. Dixon & James S. Magnuson - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (1):161-173.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  42
    Breaking Down the Bilingual Cost in Speech Production.Jasmin Sadat, Clara D. Martin, James S. Magnuson, François-Xavier Alario & Albert Costa - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (8):1911-1940.
    Bilinguals have been shown to perform worse than monolinguals in a variety of verbal tasks. This study investigated this bilingual verbal cost in a large-scale picture-naming study conducted in Spanish. We explored how individual characteristics of the participants and the linguistic properties of the words being spoken influence this performance cost. In particular, we focused on the contributions of lexical frequency and phonological similarity across translations. The naming performance of Spanish-Catalan bilinguals speaking in their dominant and non-dominant language was compared (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  32
    No compelling evidence against feedback in spoken word recognition.Michael K. Tanenhaus, James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray & Richard N. Aslin - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):348-349.
    Norris et al.'s claim that feedback is unnecessary is compromised by (1) a questionable application of Occam's razor, given strong evidence for feedback in perception; (2) an idealization of the speech recognition problem that simplifies those aspects of the input that create conditions where feedback is useful; (3) Norris et al.'s use of decision nodes that incorporate feedback to model some important empirical results; and (4) problematic linking hypotheses between crucial simulations and behavioral data.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark